I’m From Hollywood – How Andy Kaufman Tried To Combine Comedy And Wrestling

The “doctor” known to patients as Dr. Charlie Ware, according to his website was arrested Tuesday at his office at 3800 S. Ocean Drive in Hollywood, authorities said. Charlie Ware, who authorities say had no medical training or a medical license, was charged with three counts of attempting to practice medicine without a license, records show. He told investigators that he used the same product on at least a dozen patients, according to the police report. Authorities attempted to reach those clients and it’s unclear if any others suffered similar symptoms. During a U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigation, Ware told an agent that he had injected a skin-tightening product called Simildiet into Kogan’s cheeks and forehead, authorities said. The agent found that the product’s manufacturer a pharmaceutical company in Spain states that the product only may be used externally. It also contains ingredients that the state’s health department says could be toxic, according to the police report. Photos: Faces of meth, before and after Ware, 39, was released from jail Wednesday after posting a $4,500 bond, jail records show. Reached by phone Thursday, he declined to comment. Although Kogan said her condition has improved since her February 2012 treatment, there have been residual effects, such as the sensation of coldness.

Hollywood, Big Tech on Collision Course Over Who Should Police the Internet

The title of Maureen Sabines new book, Veiled Desires: Intimate Portrayals of Nuns in Postwar Anglo-American Film (Fordham University Press), refers to the paradox of having charismatic and photogenic actresses playing chaste nuns and, in the process, drawing attention to the desires their habits were thought to stifle. Wednesday’s day in photos Sabine, a professor of literary, cultural and religious studies at the University of Hong Kong, fielded several questions from Religion News Service about her book, which examines portrayals of nuns in more than 60 years of film. The interview was edited for length and clarity. Q: When and why did you first become interested in this topic? A: My core research interests in sex and religion, and theology and sexuality, led over time to a correlative interest in women, their gender representation and history. From a personal point of view, I was influenced by the nuns who taught me: the Dominicans in grade school, and the Ursulines in high school. Both orders have a distinguished history as gifted educators. I grew up in the era of Betty Friedans Feminine Mystique. My mother and her friends and neighbors were college-educated but had left the city workforce to raise families in American House Beautiful suburbs. The nuns who taught me were feminist role models, though I did not realize it at the time. They were highly educated evidently smarter than the parish priests. They instilled an ethic of hard and meaningful work, of social conscience, of a responsibility to develop ones talents not only for a life of purpose, but in service to others. I admired their strong faith, dedication and care, sense of fulfillment and energy. A rare few were genuinely holy people, and there is nothing more attractive.

Among the most contentious of issues is the safe harbor provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act , which was crafted in 1998, when Google was still in its infancy and social media meant throwing a party to watch the Seinfeld finale. The safe harbor provision allows Internet providers, search engines and other tech firms to escape liability when users post pirated content on their platforms, provided such content is promptly removed when providers get a takedown notice, or if they are otherwise warned by some kind of red flag that indicates infringing activity. This safe harbor provision is, generally speaking, something Internet providers and search engines dont want lawmakers to touch. While providers may complain that they are inundated by takedown requests Google says it receives more than a million each week to put the provision on the table risks ending up with something that saddles Internet sites with additional liability. In fact, when the green paper was unveiled, Michael Beckerman, president and CEO of the Internet Assn., a trade group formed in 2012 that includes Google, Facebook and Amazon among its members, said existing law works very well. In a statement to Variety, he said that the DMCA continues to fulfill its intended purpose of facilitating the growth and development of the Internet and the Web. In contrast, Hollywood and lobbying orgs representing other content creators complain that the safe harbor provision forces them into playing endless whacka-mole; even after enlisting their own monitoring services to find infringing content and send out takedown notices, they say piracy is still growing. While Beckerman warned that the green paper would be used by some interest groups as a call for new laws addressing online infringement, that prospect seems unlikely, not just because of the government shutdown, but because of skittishness among lawmakers to start anything like the unprecedented protest that sidelined the last major piece of antipiracy legislation, the Stop Online Piracy Act. House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., has launched a series of hearings with an eye toward revising copyright laws, but that process could take years, and undoubtedly would be contentious when and if it comes to revisiting the DMCA. The authors of the green paper recognized this, and have proposed that rather than pursue legislation, the tech and content industries should come up with their own set of best practices for identifying takedown notices. Thats easier said than done, of course. Google and others have had individual conversations with the studios; they are in business with most of them. But when it comes to hashing out a broad voluntary agreement across industries, there are, tellingly, no serious discussions. Sherwin Siy, VP of legal affairs at the public interest group Public Knowledge, said via e-mail that best practices agreements can be a big help, as they can inform players what is and what isnt useful to the other side, and provide some guideposts for dealing with a complex situation. But there can be drawbacks, he noted, as when there are not methods for redress and appeal. The problem is that complaints of abuse or mistake get the runaround. Google has argued that it has been prompt in responding to takedown requests 57 million last year, with an average response time of less than six hours, the company said and that it has been proactive in removing ad services to sites that violate its copyright policy.

Hollywood’s depiction of nuns a case of ‘Veiled Desires’

A dog chases a mock intruder during a function to celebrate the 29th Raising Day of the Indian National Security Guard (NSG) in Manesar, about 60 km (38 miles) south of New Delhi, October 16, 2013. The NSG is a federal contingency force established in 1984 and a quick reaction elite force for neutralizing militants, hijackers and kidnappers in situations which are beyond the capability of local forces to handle. REUTERS/Anindito Mukherjee (INDIA - Tags: MILITARY ANNIVERSARY TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY)

His extreme misogynistic comments offended many people who were not so willing to forget its just a character. When he took this act to the Mid-South professional wrestling territory in Tennessee it snowballed. He once tried to explain to the audience how to use a bar of soap. Needless to say, they hated him. This was also where he began his rivalry with Jerry The King Lawler, which is the central focus of the film. Without spoiling too much, Kaufmans Hollywood persona was the perfect antagonist to Lawler with his good ol boy southern charm. It made for an epic feud that included a famous scuffle on The Late Show with David Letterman. Nearly 30 years later, it is still unclear which parts of the feud were real and which parts were not. Im From Hollywood does an excellent job of capturing the unique events of Kaufmans foray into professional wrestling. It shows plenty of the footage that made the Kaufman-Lawler rivalry so engrossing, and its accompanied by a rather interesting acapella score by Richard Greene and the BOBS. However, after a viewing you find yourself wishing you could have seen more that was happening behind the scenes. Most of the interview footage of Kaufman is of him cutting promos to heighten the audiences hatred of him.